Effects of family pharmacy intervention on clinical outcomes in primary care settings in Thailand

wiwat thavornwattanayong, Namfon Sribundit

Abstract


Background

Despite pharmaceutical care had positive effect on improving patient health, currently data fact sheet illustrate slightly increasing of uncontrolled diabetes and uncontrolled hypertension among Thai elderly. Family pharmacist applied more effective communication, partnership and medication assessment by using IFFE, BATH, DRPs, DRSs, DSPs to achieve effectiveness outcomes.

Objectives

To explore the effectiveness of family pharmacist intervention compare with a usual care for diabetes patients with poor glycemic controlled and uncontrolled hypertensive patients in primary care setting.

Methods

Comparative design by recruited 8 primary health setting, randomly selected to provide as the usual care group (for 4 groups and each group had 40 patients) or family pharmacist intervention group (for 4 groups and each group had 40 patients) during January to July 2015. In family pharmacist intervention, emphasis on active communication and partnership by using IFFE, BATH technique and medication assessment concentrated about drug-related problems, drug-related suffering and drug-system problems. Both groups was received monthly follow-up visit for 3 and the end at 6 months. Two-sample t-test or Mann-Whitney U test was used for comparative parameters such as blood pressure level, fasting plasma glucose, Hb1AC level at baseline and end of project and between group.

Results

Eighty patients were recruited and follow-up for 6 months. At baseline, demographic, disease characteristics, blood pressure level and glucose parameters were similar. After 6 months, systolic blood pressure were significant decreased in both group (p < 0.0001, p < 0.0001) and  similar to fasting plasma glucose level (p = 0.033, p = 0.042), but overall parameters such as systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, fasting plasma glucose and Hb1AC level, in family pharmacist intervention group found value significant decrease more than usual care group (p = 0.002, p = 0.006, p = 0.033, p = 0.042)

Conclusion

Family pharmacist intervention could significant reduce blood pressure and blood glucose and reveal more effectiveness when compared with usual care.


Full Text:

35-40;PDF

References


Alhabib, S., M. Aldraimly, and A. Alfarhan, An evolving role of clinical pharmacists in managing diabetes: Evidence from the literature. Saudi Pharmaceutical Journal, 2016. 24(4): p. 441-446.

Levenstein, J.H., et al., The patient-centred clinical method. 1. A model for the doctor-patient interaction in family medicine. Fam Pract, 1986. 3(1): p. 24-30.

Stewart, M.A., Weston, W. W., Brown, J. B., McWhinney, I. R., Mcwilliam, C. L., Freeman, T. R., Patient-centered Medicine: Transforming the clinical method. 1995, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

David P. Rakel., W.B.J., Patient-Centered Medical Home, in Textbook of Family Medicine, D.P.R. Robert E. Rakel., Editor. 2016, Elsevier Health Sciences: Canada. p. 17-24.

Miller, W.R., & Rose, G. S. , Toward a Theory of Motivational Interviewing. The American Psychologist, 2009. 64(6): p. 527-537.

Little, P., et al., Preferences of patients for patient centred approach to consultation in primary care: observational study. BMJ : British Medical Journal, 2001. 322(7284): p. 468-468.

Dolovich, L., et al., Integrating family medicine and pharmacy to advance primary care therapeutics. Clin Pharmacol Ther, 2008. 83(6): p. 913-7.

Farrell, B., et al., Integrating into family practice: the experiences of pharmacists in Ontario, Canada. International Journal of Pharmacy Practice, 2008. 16(5): p. 309-315.

Egnew, T.R., The Meaning Of Healing: Transcending Suffering. Annals of Family Medicine, 2005. 3(3): p. 255-262.

Wendler, M.C., Understanding healing: a conceptual analysis. J Adv Nurs, 1996. 24(4): p. 836-42.

Santschi, V., et al., Pharmacist Interventions to Improve Cardiovascular Disease Risk Factors in Diabetes. A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials, 2012. 35(12): p. 2706-2717.

Santschi, V., et al., Improving Blood Pressure Control Through Pharmacist Interventions: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Journal of the American Heart Association, 2014. 3(2).

Sookaneknun, P., et al., Pharmacist involvement in primary care improves hypertensive patient clinical outcomes. Ann Pharmacother, 2004. 38(12): p. 2023-8.

Dolovich L, K.J., Howard M, Rodriguez MC, Gaebel K, Haq M, Farrell B, Pottie K, Sellors C. Cardiovascular outcomes of a pharmaceutical care program integrated into family practices. in 4th Canadian Therapeutics Congress. 2007. Canada: Can J Clin Pharmacol.

Mehos, B.M., J.J. Saseen, and E.J. MacLaughlin, Effect of pharmacist intervention and initiation of home blood pressure monitoring in patients with uncontrolled hypertension. Pharmacotherapy, 2000. 20(11): p. 1384-9.

Stewart, M., et al., The impact of patient-centered care on outcomes. J Fam Pract, 2000. 49(9): p. 796-804.

Epstein, R.M., Mindful practice. Jama, 1999. 282(9): p. 833-9.

Epstein, R.M. and R.L. Street, The Values and Value of Patient-Centered Care. Annals of Family Medicine, 2011. 9(2): p. 100-103.

Jonas, W.B. and R.A. Chez, Toward optimal healing environments in health care. J Altern Complement Med, 2004. 10 Suppl 1: p. S1-6.

Rosenberg, E.E., M.T. Lussier, and C. Beaudoin, Lessons for clinicians from physician-patient communication literature. Arch Fam Med, 1997. 6(3): p. 279-83.

Hsu, C., et al., Healing in primary care: a vision shared by patients, physicians, nurses, and clinical staff. Ann Fam Med, 2008. 6(4): p. 307-14.

Mechanic, D. and M. Schlesinger, The impact of managed care on patients' trust in medical care and their physicians. Jama, 1996. 275(21): p. 1693-7.

Wanyonyi, K.L., et al., A systematic review and meta-analysis of face-to-face communication of tailored health messages: Implications for practice. Patient Education and Counseling, 2011. 85(3): p. 348-355.

Kelley, J.M., et al., The Influence of the Patient-Clinician Relationship on Healthcare Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. PLoS ONE, 2014. 9(4): p. e94207.

Di Blasi, Z., et al., Influence of context effects on health outcomes: a systematic review. Lancet, 2001. 357(9258): p. 757-62.

Gerstein, H.C., et al., Effects of intensive glucose lowering in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med, 2008. 358(24): p. 2545-59.

Soe, K., et al., Management of type 2 diabetes mellitus in the elderly. Maturitas. 70(2): p. 151-159.

Ismail-Beigi, F., et al., Individualizing glycemic targets in type 2 diabetes mellitus: implications of recent clinical trials. Ann Intern Med, 2011. 154(8): p. 554-9.

Brown, A.F., et al., Guidelines for improving the care of the older person with diabetes mellitus. J Am Geriatr Soc, 2003. 51(5 Suppl Guidelines): p. S265-80.

Stratton, I.M., et al., Association of glycaemia with macrovascular and microvascular complications of type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 35): prospective observational study. Bmj, 2000. 321(7258): p. 405-12.


Refbacks